Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Unverified Commit 5b272e3f authored by Massimiliano Culpo's avatar Massimiliano Culpo Committed by GitHub
Browse files

commands: use a single ThreadPool for `spack versions` (#16749)

This fixes a fork bomb in `spack versions`. Recursive generation of pools
to scrape URLs in `_spider` was creating large numbers of processes.
Instead of recursively creating process pools, we now use a single
`ThreadPool` with a concurrency limit.

More on the issue: having ~10 users running at the same time spack
versions on front-end nodes caused kernel lockup due to the high number
of sockets opened (sys-admin reports ~210k distributed over 3 nodes).
Users were internal, so they had ulimit -n set to ~70k.

The forking behavior could be observed by just running:

    $ spack versions boost

and checking the number of processes spawned. Number of processes
per se was not the issue, but each one of them opens a socket
which can stress `iptables`.

In the original issue the kernel watchdog was reporting:

    Message from syslogd@login03 at May 19 12:01:30 ...
    kernel:Watchdog CPU:110 Hard LOCKUP
    Message from syslogd@login03 at May 19 12:01:31 ...
    kernel:watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#110 stuck for 23s! [python3:2756]
    Message from syslogd@login03 at May 19 12:01:31 ...
    kernel:watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#94 stuck for 22s! [iptables:5603]
parent 92e24950
No related branches found
No related tags found
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment